No insider purchase over the last 90 days. The latest was filed 03 Jan 2025.
Sow Good Inc. is a Food & Agriculture company. Its directors and officers file their transactions with SEC (Form 4). 7 insiders have disclosed 8 filings since 18 October 2025.
No open-market purchase or sale appears among the filings, only grants, plan transactions and other operations. Because grants and exercises are largely decided by remuneration plans, they are not counted as purchases here.
Insider buying of Sow Good Inc. has been absent for the past year. Between a trade and the moment it shows up on SEC (Form 4), the median delay is 5 days. US insiders must file a Form 4 within two business days of a trade.
Compared with its exchange (5,816 companies, median 19 filings), a count of 8 filings is below the norm. Looking back to 2021, when coverage begins, insiders filed 28 purchases and no sales. The 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2025 shows -40.6 m USD of net income.
For comparison within the same sector, see the insider buying recorded at Village Farms International, Inc. and Orkla ASA. Source: insider filings from SEC (Form 4). Past trades are no guide to future returns.
Entry is the close on the day after publication, the first price a reader could act on. Prices in the listing currency. Past moves are not a forecast.
This score ranks the purchase within its own market. A position size is suggested only on the venues of the backtested strategy universe; elsewhere, signals stay on watch. Not investment advice.
FY ended December 2025 · cache
25 of 80 declarations
Sow Good Inc. is a U.S.-based consumer packaged goods company listed on the NASDAQ in the United States. The company built its identity around a distinctive niche in freeze-dried candy and snack products, a category it helped popularize through a brand proposition centered on novelty, strong flavor intensity, and a crunchy texture. Co-founded by Claudia Goldfarb and Ira Goldfarb, Sow Good developed around a highly recognizable consumer brand and the slogan-style positioning of “hyper dried, hyper crunchy, hyper flavorful.” For international investors, the company is best understood as an innovative branded food player rather than a traditional confectionery manufacturer.
From an operating standpoint, Sow Good originally invested heavily in proprietary freeze-drying capabilities in Irving, Texas, where it constructed a custom manufacturing facility and built equipment tailored to its product line. Its historical business model relied on direct manufacturing, product development, and multi-channel distribution into retail formats such as grocery, convenience, and specialty channels. In its SEC filings, the company describes its products as candy and snack items processed with low heat in a near-vacuum environment to remove moisture, creating a long shelf life and a uniquely crunchy eating experience. The company’s intellectual property base is primarily brand-led, built around trademarks, trade dress, product naming, and packaging assets rather than patents.
A key point for investors is that Sow Good’s profile changed materially in late 2025. According to SEC filings, the company sold substantially all of its manufacturing assets on December 30, 2025 and moved away from direct production toward a more asset-light model. Under the new structure, a third-party distributor became the exclusive distributor of the company’s remaining finished goods inventory, and Sow Good’s role shifted toward brand ownership, commercial oversight, and commission-based participation in product sales. This is an important strategic pivot because it reduces asset intensity but also increases dependence on counterparties and execution in distribution.
Competitively, Sow Good remains a niche player in a small but attention-grabbing segment of the snack and confectionery market. Its appeal has historically come from product differentiation, social-media-friendly branding, and consumer curiosity around freeze-dried treats. At the same time, the business has faced meaningful operating challenges, including losses, liquidity pressure, and a limited scale versus larger food companies. Recent SEC disclosures also indicate substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern and a NASDAQ listing compliance issue announced in April 2026 related to minimum stockholders’ equity. These developments are material for anyone evaluating the equity story.
Geographically, the company is headquartered in the United States and has been associated with Texas operations, while its market exposure is primarily U.S.-based even though the new distribution agreement is described as worldwide. For French-speaking investors, Sow Good Inc. should be viewed as a U.S. micro-cap consumer-food story combining brand innovation, restructuring risk, and significant financial uncertainty. Its investment case now depends less on manufacturing scale and more on the durability of the brand, the effectiveness of the new distribution model, and its ability to stabilize the balance sheet.
Purchases our model currently ranks for the recommendations list.
All recommendations| Fiscal year end | Revenue | Net income | Diluted EPS | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | n.d. | -40.6 m USD | -3.44 USD | 10-K |
| Dec 2024 | n.d. | -3.7 m USD | -0.40 USD | 10-K |
| Dec 2023 | 16.1 m USD | -3.1 m USD | -0.59 USD | 10-K |
| Dec 2022 | 428,132 USD | -12.1 m USD | -2.51 USD | 10-K |
| Dec 2021 | 88,440 USD | -6.9 m USD | -1.61 USD | 10-K |
Amounts in USD, as filed (forms 10-K, 20-F or 40-F). Source: SEC EDGAR.